A few weeks ago it came to our attention that Rigol’s DS2000-series oscilloscopes were. Kruger Centrifugal Fan Selection Software. We had expected a small microcontroller device would be developed to send these bits to a scope automatically, and we never imagined the final version of this tool hack would be so elegant.
First impressions - Rigol DSA815TG spectrum analyzer. The actual user guide is supplied on CD or available as a download from their web. The Rigol DSA815 met.
Now it’s possible to and a great encryption hack. The engineers over a Rigol (bless their hearts) used the same hardware for the $800, 70MHz DS2072 and the $1600, 200MHz DS2202.
The only difference between the two are a few bits in the scope’s memory that are easily unlocked if you have the right key. A few folks over on the EEV Blog forum figured out the private key for the scope’s encryption and the user.
The upgrade process is extremely simple: get the serial number of your DS2072, put it in the keygen, and enter the resulting key into the scope. Rayman Advance Rom Gba Ita more. Reboot, and you have a $1600 scope you bought for half price. Posted in Tagged,, Post navigation.
I tink you’ll do better in business getting more for your money. What is NOT good business is taking advantage of your customer. Smart Modular Technologies Flash Card Driver Xp.
If I had paid $1600 for a unit that was the exact same as a $800 unit (and cost the exact same to produce), I would be very angry. As a customer, you have to assume that if one model costs double what the other does, that there is some higher cost to drive that price. In this case there isn’tthey just locked up some capability to extort more money from the guy who is willing to pay more? Why don’t they just charge $800 for all the units and not have the capabilities locked up?
I guess because some people are willing to pay more. That’s all fine and goodunless you’re found out, as this company has been. If there’s a reason to charge more money for the higher end unit (like it uses better components, or has other costs that are higher), that’s one thingand that’s expected. But if they are truly the same unit and just locked up, with one person being charged double, that seems unethical to me. If not unethical, then risky.
Nothing stays a secret for long. They’re not taking advantage of their customer, plain and simple.
You might have read what I wrote, but you missed the point of it. Pay $1600 for a unit and it is *not* the exact same as the $800 unit it’s got better capabilities and functions.
Pay $800 and get the unit with lesser capabilities and functions, but if it’s the unit you need, then it’s the right one for you. If you need the better capabilities and functions, then pay for them. “Why don’t they just charge $800 for all the units and not have the capabilities locked up?” Really? Good luck with that.
If they were going to standardize on price, they’d set it at the higher price, a price which is competitive for the feature sets that would be available. What you (and everyone else here who’s whining about it) fail to get is that they’re doing us a favor by making a downline unit available at an excellent price that more than meets the needs that most of us here have. If any of us need more bandwidth, then there are upline units for that with commensurate pricing. If you ever get around to living in the real world, you’re in for some cruel surprises! The market provides the solution if you don’t like it, do it better yourself. “If I had paid $1600 for a unit that was the exact same as a $800 unit (and cost the exact same to produce), I would be very angry.
As a customer, you have to assume that if one model costs double what the other does, that there is some higher cost to drive that price.” So your assumption is that everyone is selling you their products based on the cost of the transistors and resistors? Or maybe it should be based on the cost of the raw carbon and silicon? Prices for anything you buy are set based on supply and demand. Lowering the prices means generally (not always) you will sell more units. If the profit from those extra units is sufficient, it will offset the price decrease. Thus, there is some optimum price which results in the most profit which is neither the highest nor lowest possible price.